Legal Opinion

In re Birmingham

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 4, 2006No. 2005-089PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGalway, J.

The respondent, Gregory Birmingham, appeals an order of the Trial Court (DiMeo, J.) denying his motion to: (1) strike the default judgment and vacate the final divorce decree; and (2) vacate or modify the division of property in the final decree. He also appeals an order of the Marital Master (DalPra, M.) denying his request that the modification of child support and alimony be retroactive to the date of the temporary agreement rather than the date of notice to the petitioner, Karen Birmingham. We affirm.

The record supports the following facts. In July 2002, the petitioner filed for divorce.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. In re GronvaldtSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  4. Sommers v. SommersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  5. Appeal of DemerittSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Taber-McCarthySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  2. In RE TABER-McCARTHYSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  3. In Re GoulartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  4. In the Matter of Holly Doherty and William DohertySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  5. In the Matter of Terrie Harman and Thomas McCarronSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API