Gulf Caribe Maritime, Inc. v. Mobile County Revenue Commissioner
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1DissentMurdock, Judge
The vessels in question are instrumen-talities of interstate commerce.6 A state may tax such vessels without impermissi-bly burdening interstate commerce when the tax “[(1)] is applied to an activity with a substantial nexus with the taxing State, [(2)] is fairly apportioned, [(3)] does not discriminate against interstate commerce, and [(4)] is fairly related to the services provided by the State.” Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady, 430 U.S. 274, 279, 97“ S.Ct. 1076, 51 L.Ed.2d 326 (1977) (emphasis added). As a corollary, a domiciliary state is precluded from imposing an ad valorem tax on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Leather's Best, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. S.S. Mormaclynx, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.