Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stern v. United States. Giordano v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 25, 1953No. 11597, 11598Published

1DissentMcALLISTER, Circuit Judge

There appears to me no reversible error in the court’s charge on the question of value wherein it instructed the jury that the market value at the time and place of taking was the true standard of value within the meaning of the statute, and that if there was no market value for the furs at the time and place in question, the jury could consider the cost of replacement of the furs at the time and place as the value of the furs for the purpose of the case.

Among the witnesses for the government, Stephen J. Peterlin, an expert furrier, testified that, considering the use which the two garments…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Childress v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Norton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  4. Printz v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API