Legal Opinion
Kenilworth Borough v. Graceland, C., Assn.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided May 6, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Graceland Memorial Park Association, one of the defendants herein, moves to dismiss the bill on several grounds, one of which is that if complainant has any right to relief upon the facts alleged in the bill (which defendant does not concede) there is an adequate remedy at law.
The bill alleges that in the year 1935 defendant Graceland Memorial Park Association, then incorporated under the name of Sunset Park Cemetery Association, being the owner of a tract of land in the borough of Kenilworth, petitioned the borough council for a permit to locate a cemetery thereon; that the application was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burdick v. GrimshawNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Inhabitants of Township v. WattersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1901
- Bellingham v. PalmerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1895
- Daab v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
- De Bevoise v. H. & W. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1904
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ergowerx International, LLC v. Maxell Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Wiatt v. Winston & Strawn LLPDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
- Riverside Acquisition Group LLC v. Vertis Holdings, Inc. (In re Vertis Holdings, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2015
- Onderdonk v. Presbyterian Homes of NJ, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Bond v. National Financial Services (In re U.S. Mortgage Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.