State v. Marx
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Malone,J.:
The State of Kansas appeals the district court’s decision granting motions to suppress evidence arising from a vehicle stop. This is a consolidated appeal involving codefendants, Peter J. Marx and Desiree M. Marx. The district court suppressed the evidence because it found the vehicle stop was unlawful. We agree with the district court’s finding that the vehicle stop was not justified as a public safety or community caretaking stop. However, we disagree with the district court’s finding that the sheriff s deputy lacked reasonable suspicion to stop the Marxes’ vehicle for failure to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. OzbirnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- State v. AckwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. BryanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. PortingSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MarxSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. WoodruffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- State v. KirkCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- United States v. NeeleyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- State v. MarxSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009