Mann v. City of Heber Springs
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1ConcurrenceJim Johnson, Associate Justice
I agree with the majority view. This concurrence is written for the purpose of emphasizing the fact that the protection of the constitutional rights of the least deserving of us is in reality the protection of the constitutional rights of all of us.
Bitter experience through the ages has taught men desirous of freedom that there could be no freedom without the recognition that free men must possess certain inherent and indefeasible rights, amongest which is the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects.
The authors of our Bill of Rights attested to this great truth when…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Clubb v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
- Venable v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Woolem v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929