Legal Opinion

Howell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Howell, convicted of a felony and sentenced to the penitentiary, was immediately imprisoned therein. Later, and within 60 days, a writ of error from this court was duly allowed, issued, and filed. He now applies to us for bail, pending the hearing.

In McKnight v. United States, 113 F. 451, 452, 51 C. C. A. 285, in an opinion by Judge Lurton, this court distinctly held that a writ of error in a criminal case not capital is a matter of right, without giving security, and that, if filed within 60 days, it operates as a supersedeas. R. S. § 1007 (Comp. St. § 1666). The provision for security is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McKnight v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  2. Hanes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
  3. United States v. ShafferDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hamel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API