Legal Opinion
KMEL, MGT v. ARTHUR ZULICK, et al.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 15, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00092Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KMEL, MGT, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:26-CV-00092 Plaintiff, v. (MEHALCHICK, J.) ARTHUR ZULICK, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM Before the Court is a report and recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson recommending that the Court grant Defendants Kate Best, Ninti Mateen, Shirley Wood, Michelle Warsaw, and Todd W. Weitzmann’s (together, “County Defendants”) motion to dismiss (Doc. 17) and deny Plaintiff KMEL, MGT’s (“KMEL”) motion for a preliminary injunction. (Doc. 10; Doc. 29, at 23). On May 1, 2026, KMEL filed objections…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Norman Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital Allegheny County Jail Camp Hill Prison United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.