Legal Opinion

Schmid v. Langenberg

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 1975No. 36110PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant was sorely bruised in a stock market transaction and has sought healing balm and recompense through recoupment of his losses from defendants-respondents, who are general partners in the stock brokerage firm of Reinholdt & Gardner, and through whom plaintiff purchased certain stock. Plaintiff sued under § 409.411(a)(1) of the Missouri Uniform Securities Act 1 alleging that defendants had violated § 409.301 by selling plaintiff an unregistered security. Defendants claim that the sale of stock was unsolicited and thereby an exempt transaction under §…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,496 Richard J. Sargent v. Genesco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Charles F. Curry and Company v. HedrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. Home Indemnity Co. v. Reynolds & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  4. Moss v. Mindlin's, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  5. Bower v. Hog Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Busch & Latta Painting Corp. v. State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Mercantile Trust Co., NA v. HarperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Doyle Ex Rel. Doyle v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Anderson v. MutertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Hill v. BartonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API