Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Van Epps

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action of foreclosure.

1Opinion of the CourtForbes, J.

This action is to foreclose a mortgage security which is accompanied by a bond.

The defendants Van Epps are the present owners of the real estate incumbered, and are in possession and the occupation of said premises. These defendants are also the grandchildren of Abraham Van Epps, Sr., deceased, and the sons of Abraham Van Epps, Jr., deceased.

The complaint is the usual one in an action of foreclosure and alleges that the defendants have, or claim to have, some right or interest in and to the premises, a description of which is particularly set forth in the complaint. Without setting up any…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. . WigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Van Horne v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Campbell v. . BeaumontNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Cromwell v. . MacLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of MoehringNew York Court of Appeals · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barber v. RoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Jefferson v. BangsNew York Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Solley v. WestcottNew York Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API