Legal Opinion
Spisak v. Hudson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 11, 2008No. 03-4034PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
On October 20, 2006, this Court issued an opinion partially granting habeas relief to Petitioner, Frank G. Spisak, and ordering a new mitigation phase trial. Spisak v. Mitchell, 465 F.3d 684 (6th Cir.2006). Respondent warden thereafter filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court. On October 9, 2007, the Supreme Court granted certiora-ri, vacated the judgment of this Court, and remanded the case to this Court for further consideration in light of Carey v. Musladin, — U.S. —, 127 S.Ct. 649, 166 L.Ed.2d 482 (2006), and Schriro v. Landrigan, — U.S. —, 127…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Schriro v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smith v. SpisakSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Hoffner v. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Goff v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Hereford v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Cowans v. BagleyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.