Legal Opinion

Levine v. Sidney Rosenstein & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings, consisting of complaint, answer and demurrer by plaintiff to separate defense, for insufficiency.

1Opinion of the CourtErlanger, J.

For a separate defense to an action upon an agreement for surrender by the tenant of an unexpired term, not exceeding one year, under a lease of premises in the city of New York, the defendant alleges that the agreement was not in writing. The plaintiff demurs to this defense. A paroi agreement to surrender an unexpired term of a lease, where the interest of the tenant thus surrendered is not to exceed a year’s duration, is valid, although to take effect in futuro, under the provisions of the Statute of Frauds relating to the general subject of leases. Real Prop. Law, §§ 242, 259; Allen v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. . DevlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  2. Souhami v. BrownstoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  3. Berkowitz v. IorizzoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 425 East Eighty-sixth Street Corp. v. WormsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API