Legal Opinion

Cagianello v. Letare

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided December 4, 1961No. File No. 80205Published

1Opinion of the CourtLugg, J.

This action arises from a collision of a truck owned by the defendant city of Hartford and driven by its employee, the defendant Letare, with a vehicle owned by the plaintiff Dunn and operated by her son, the plaintiff Cagianello. The complaint is in two counts: One, for injuries to Cagianello; the second, for damages to Mrs. Dunn’s car and other expenses. Both counts are against both defendants. The latter “demur to the plaintiffs’ complaint as the plaintiffs here failed to allege that they were in the exercise of due care.” While the parties in their memoranda confuse the singular and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  2. Bergner v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  3. Buxton v. UllmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  4. City of Norwalk v. DanieleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  5. State Ex Rel. Barlow v. KaminskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API