Legal Opinion
Banco General Runinahui, S.A. v. Citibank International
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 10, 1996No. 95-4444PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Citibank International (Citibank) and Banco General Runinahui, S.A. (Banco) appeal the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of R.M. Wade & Co. (Wade), arguing the court improperly concluded Citibank had wrongfully dishonored nonconforming documents Wade presented under the second of two letters of credit issued by Banco in favor of Wade and subsequently confirmed by Citibank. We affirm the district court’s judgment as to all claims except those of Appellants contending the court erred in finding Citibank barred from dishonoring the documents Wade…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dibrell Brothers International S.A., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Banca Nazionale Del Lavoro, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Corporacion De Mercadeo Agricola v. Mellon Bank InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Marino Industries Corp., Cross-Appellee v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Courtaulds North America, Inc. v. North Carolina National Bank, a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Alaska Textile Co., Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Banco General Runinahui, S.A. v. Citibank InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996