Legal Opinion

Blutreich v. Amalgamated Dwellings, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 4, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*270Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered October 23, 2003, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to hold defendant in contempt insofar as to refer the matter for a hearing on the issue of legal fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The order was clearly a contempt finding against defendant for failure to comply with a prior unconditional court order to issue privatized stock to plaintiffs (see Blutreich v Amalgamated Dwellings, 298 AD2d 185 [2002], lv denied 100 NY2d 501 [2003]). Accordingly, legal fees were properly recoverable by plaintiffs pursuant to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holskin v. 22 Prince Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blutreich v. Amalgamated Dwellings, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API