Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Berardino v. Berardino

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1929No. Appeals 198PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

In proceedings for maintenance brought by Marguerite Berardino against her husband, Michael Berardino, under the Act of April 13, 1867, P. L. 78, and its supplements and amendments, the county court of Allegheny County ordered the defendant to pay his wife $5,000 cash within thirty days, and $300 per month, for her 'support, and to enter his recognizance with approved surety in the sum of $10,000, conditioned for his compliance with said order. Both parties appealed.

We may say, at the outset, that we cannot approve of so much of the order as requires the husband to pay…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parkhurst v. . BerdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Henry v. SneedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  3. Danley v. DanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Seitz v. SeitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Stocker v. StockerNebraska Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Huffman v. SimmonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. IacovellaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Commonwealth v. G.Y.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Com. Ex Rel. Berardino v. BerardinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Berardino v. BerardinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API