Legal Opinion · Dissent

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 2006No. 2002-SC-307-DG, 2002-SC-407-DG, 2002-SC-408-DGPublished

1DissentCooper, Justice

I dissent from the majority opinion because (1) the insurance policies issued by American Nuclear Insurers (ANI) are third-party liability policies that do not provide coverage either for property damage to the insured site or for capital improvements to the site itself (referred to as “site measures”); (2) the trial court properly instructed the jury on the issue of fortuity and the jury’s verdict on that issue would preclude ANI’s liability with respect to the Commonwealth of Kentucky and U.S. Ecology even if coverage otherwise existed; and (3) ANI was not required to provide a defense to…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API