Legal Opinion
Camardi v. Sinawski
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 23, 2002PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*358The Supreme Court erred in concluding that the appellant failed to sustain her burden of proving that Gary Sinawski was not a resident of the 16th Assembly District, Nassau County, for the 12 months immediately preceding the primary election to be held on September 10, 2002 (see Election Law § 2-102 [3]). “Residence” is “deemed to mean that place where a person maintains a fixed, permanent and principal home and to which he [or she], wherever temporarily located, always intends to return” (Election Law § 1-104 [22]). There was testimony adduced at the hearing that Sinawski moved to Graywood…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- MATTER OF HOSLEY v. CurryNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- MATTER OF LEMISHOW v. BlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Ramos v. GomezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Lemishow v. BlackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fernandez v. MonegroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Willis v. Suffolk County Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Justice v. GamacheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Matter of Weiss v. TeachoutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Diamondstone v. ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.