Legal Opinion

Dorise v. Bragg

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided August 5, 2020No. 1:17-cv-01881Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Mikhael Dorise, C/A No. 1:17-cv-1881-JFA Petitioner, v. ORDER Warden Bragg, Respondent. I. INTRODUCTION Mikhael Dorise (“Petitioner”), proceeding pro se, filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2), (D.S.C.), the case was referred to a Magistrate Judge for review. The Magistrate Judge assigned to this action1 prepared a thorough Report and Recommendation (“Report”) and opines this Court should grant Respondent’s motion to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  4. Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. David E. Camby v. Larry Davis James M. LesterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API