Dorise v. Bragg
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Mikhael Dorise, C/A No. 1:17-cv-1881-JFA Petitioner, v. ORDER Warden Bragg, Respondent. I. INTRODUCTION Mikhael Dorise (“Petitioner”), proceeding pro se, filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2), (D.S.C.), the case was referred to a Magistrate Judge for review. The Magistrate Judge assigned to this action1 prepared a thorough Report and Recommendation (“Report”) and opines this Court should grant Respondent’s motion to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- David E. Camby v. Larry Davis James M. LesterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.