Port v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Judge.
The question is whether certain expenditures for legal services incurred By plaintiff Walter Port 1 are deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses under § 23(a) (1) or as nontrade or nonbusiness expenses under § 23(a) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C. § 23(a) (1, 2) 2 . The Government resists the deduction primarily on the basis of § 24(a) (1) of the Code, 26 U.S.C. § 24(a) (1) 3 . The facts are not in dispute.
Plaintiff is a duly licensed medical doctor in the State of California. In 1952, he was indicted under 26 U.S.C. § 145 (b) 4 for willful…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commissioner v. HeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Kornhauser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Trust Under the Will of Bingham v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Tank Truck Rentals, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Lykes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commissioner v. TellierSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Michael Shapiro and Rae ShapiroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Don Gilmore and Sue Gilmore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
- M.H. Bell and Bettie Lou Bell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Thomas Crawley Davis and Grace Ethel Davis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.