Legal Opinion

Port v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 16, 1958No. 526-57PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

The question is whether certain expenditures for legal services incurred By plaintiff Walter Port 1 are deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses under § 23(a) (1) or as nontrade or nonbusiness expenses under § 23(a) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C. § 23(a) (1, 2) 2 . The Government resists the deduction primarily on the basis of § 24(a) (1) of the Code, 26 U.S.C. § 24(a) (1) 3 . The facts are not in dispute.

Plaintiff is a duly licensed medical doctor in the State of California. In 1952, he was indicted under 26 U.S.C. § 145 (b) 4 for willful…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. HeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Kornhauser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Trust Under the Will of Bingham v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Tank Truck Rentals, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Lykes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. TellierSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Michael Shapiro and Rae ShapiroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  3. Don Gilmore and Sue Gilmore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  4. M.H. Bell and Bettie Lou Bell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  5. Thomas Crawley Davis and Grace Ethel Davis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API