Holleman & Son v. Bradley Fertilizer Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint. Before Judge Butt. Taylor superior court. April 12, 1898. The Bradley Fertilizer Company sued G. T. Holleman & Son, for $594 principal, besides interest, alleged to be due upon a promissory note of the defendants, payable to the plaintiff, for $1,164, dated April 30, 1888, and due November 15 after date.
Read the full summary
Complaint. Before Judge Butt. Taylor superior court. April 12, 1898. The Bradley Fertilizer Company sued G. T. Holleman & Son, for $594 principal, besides interest, alleged to be due upon a promissory note of the defendants, payable to the plaintiff, for $1,164, dated April 30, 1888, and due November 15 after date. On February 24, 1892, the plaintiff amended the declaration "by alleging: Defendants are indebted to the'plaintiff $594, together with interest on that amount from January 25, 1889, for that on or about March 13, 1888, the plaintiff contracted with the defendants to supply them…
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
The following is the written contract declared upon by plaintiff below in its amended petition, and which was introduced on the trial of the case:
“Bradley Fertilizer Company, Boston, Mass.
“This agreement made this 13th day of March, 1888, between Bradley Fertilizer Company of Boston, Mass., and G. T. Holleman <k Son of Lamar’s Mill, Upson- Co-., Ga., witnesseth, *159that said Bradley Fertilizer Company hereby.-agrees to supply said G. T. Holleman & Son with a limited quantity of fertilizer ■ for sale by them during the season of 1887 and 1888, upon fol- • lowing terms and conditions: The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clarke, Harrison & Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Shuman v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Ingram v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
- Snelling v. Arbuckle Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Hammond, Hull & Co. v. WilcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887