Legal Opinion

Hatton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 12, 1997No. 95-4105PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm appellant’s convictions for possession and sale of cocaine but reverse his sentences to the extent that they impose simultaneous periods of incarceration and probation and remand for correction.

Appellant was sentenced to three months in the county jail followed by two years probation on Count I, and one year in the county jail followed by three years probation on Count II. The sentences were to run concurrently; therefore, nine months of the probation on Count I was to be served simultaneously with the inearcerative portion of Count II. The second and fifth districts have held that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. Barr v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Horner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. Dewitt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  5. Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Foster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Regisma v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Renaldo J. Bell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  4. Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API