Legal Opinion
Franklin v. Ford Motor Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided December 8, 1992No. Docket 139658PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals by leave granted an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board that found that plaintiff suffered periods of total disability that entitled him to workers’ compensation benefits to the extent those benefits were not barred by the two-year-back rule of MCL 418.381(2); MSA 17.237(381X2). The wcab further found that plaintiff was entitled to reimbursement for medical expenses caused by his work-related disabilities, and that those expenses were not limited by the two-year-back rule.
The only issue raised is whether and to what extent the two-year-back rule applies to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lahti v. FosterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Selk v. Detroit Plastic ProductsMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Romein v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Hurd v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hill v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Drouillard v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Riza v. Delray Baking Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Morris v. Detroit Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Kosiel v. Arrow Liquors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.