Hanly v. Blackford
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Chancee*.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson
delivered tlie Opinion of the Court.
ÍN the year 1800, Benjamin Blackford bought from William Conner, ten acres of land, described in the bond, 7 . . . . of that date, for a title, “ as adjoining him (Blackford) on the north,” without any other designation of boundary or locality. But, ten acres were “ laid off” to him, bounded on the north by the land on which he lived, and on the west by the road from Nicholasville to Lexington ; and of the whole of which he retained the possession and exclusive use from 1800 to sometime in 1828, when John H. Hanly enclosed a part of it, which he claims…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Henderson v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
- Fordyce Lumber Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Montgomery v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- Henry Gray v. Frank StewartKentucky Supreme Court · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.