Legal Opinion

Hanly v. Blackford

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 2, 1833PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Chancee*.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

delivered tlie Opinion of the Court.

ÍN the year 1800, Benjamin Blackford bought from William Conner, ten acres of land, described in the bond, 7 . . . . of that date, for a title, “ as adjoining him (Blackford) on the north,” without any other designation of boundary or locality. But, ten acres were “ laid off” to him, bounded on the north by the land on which he lived, and on the west by the road from Nicholasville to Lexington ; and of the whole of which he retained the possession and exclusive use from 1800 to sometime in 1828, when John H. Hanly enclosed a part of it, which he claims…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Henderson v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
  3. Fordyce Lumber Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  4. Montgomery v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  5. Henry Gray v. Frank StewartKentucky Supreme Court · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API