Legal Opinion
Harris v. Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 21, 2025No. 0:24-cv-01687Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Kayla Harris and Stephanie Braulick, Case No. 24-cv-1687 (KMM/JFD) individually, and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, ORDER v. Gillette Children’s Specialty Healthcare, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, Defendant. Pending before the Court is Defendant Gillette Children’s Specialty Healthcare’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF 20) the Complaint filed by Plaintiffs Kayla Harris and Stephanie Braulick (“Plaintiffs”), individually and on behalf of a putative nationwide class. For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s motion…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.