Mervis v. United States
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
J. SKELLY WRIGHT, District Judge.
The above entitled civil action having ■come on for trial before the court sitting without a jury, and due consideration having been given to the pleadings, stipulations of fact and exhibits, testimony and briefs on file, the court enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Rule 52 •of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.
Findings of Fact.
1. This is an action arising under the internal revenue laws of the United States for recovery of taxes paid pursuant to the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, 26 U.S.C. § 3301 et…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Edwards v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Silver v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1954
- Jagolinzer v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1957
- Metropolitan Roofing & Modernizing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
- Security Roofing & Construction Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Illinois Tri-Seal Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Illinois Tri-Seal Products, Inc. v. The United States. John D. Buchanan, Howard Brown and Edward Marcus, D/B/A Tri-Seal Installation Co. v. The United States. John D. Buchanan and Frank Commiso D/B/A Tri-State Installation Co. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965