Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 1, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal defendant argues that the judgment should be reversed because of prosecutorial misconduct and because of an error in the court’s charge on reasonable doubt and in its supplemental charge on the voluntariness of defendant’s statements. None of the alleged incidents of prosecutorial misconduct was preserved for our review as a matter of law and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. By failing to object to the court’s charge, defendant failed to preserve the alleged errors in the charge for our review as a matter of law (see, People v…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. BowickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API