Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Zale Corp.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERBY L. JENKINS, Special Justice.

The plaintiff in the Circuit Court, Edd Johnston, sued the defendants for malicious prosecution. The trial court sustained a motion to dismiss and the plaintiff has appealed.

The pertinent portions of the complaint read as follows:

"4. On or about September 2, 1971, the defendant, Zale Corp., had certain problems in obtaining a correct balance at their Murfreesboro store. A representative of the home office of the defendant came to Nashville and relieved plaintiff from his work with Zale’s. Then, some two weeks later, the Zale Corp. instructed the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. AH Robins CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Dunn v. Alabama Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  3. Lawson v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  4. Smithson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kerney v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  2. Jett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  3. State v. WhiteCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  4. Brown v. Parrata Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Ronnie Gordon v. Tractor Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API