Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Sciambra v. Emblem, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1950No. 10,371Published

1Concurrence

REGAN,; Judge

(concurring).

■ The majority opinion finds as á 'fact that there was ‘no meeting of the' minds between plaintiff and defendant with respect to the sale and purchase of the television receiver, the subject of this litigation, and, therefore, no contract of sale existed.

The. reasons for • judgment written by the court, a qua, impressed upon the author *635that initially a question of law and not one ■of fact had ‘been raised by that court and presented to this court, which, because of the very nature of our appellate jurisdiction, required primary consideration in the majority opinion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Home Services v. MarvinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Noto v. BlascoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Succession of PiffetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
  4. Brandon v. GottliebLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Mouton ex rel. Halsted v. NobleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1846

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API