Johns v. Rozet
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss based on the Colorado River doctrine, issue preclusion, and lack of personal jurisdiction. After careful consideration of the defendants’ motion, the opposition thereto, the underlying law, and the entire record herein, the Court shall deny the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
I. BACKGROUND
This case has a tortuous history. A related case was filed in March 1987 in the District of Columbia Superior Court. The plaintiffs, low-income tenants in a housing project, the Tyler House, sought redress from their…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Atlantigas Corp. v. Nisource, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Phillips v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Johns v. RozetDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Cerit v. CeritDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2002
- Potter v. Toei Animation IncorporatedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.