Vaughn v. Vermilion Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
The legal principles stated today in our opinion in Kaiser Aetna v. United States, ante, p. 164, control the disposition of this case. Because of its posture here, however, we find it necessary to remand the case to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana. We think a brief statement of the facts and proceedings below will be helpful to an understanding of our disposition.
Respondent Vermilion Corp. leases a substantial amount of acreage, owned by Exxon Co., in the State of Louisiana. The land is traversed by a system of manmade canals, which are approximately 60 feet wide and 8 feet deep. The canals…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Vermilion Corp. v. VaughnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Ilhenny v. BroussardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
3Cited by38 opinions
- Vermilion Corp. v. VaughnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- State v. BarrasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Summersgill Dardar v. Lafourche Realty Co., Inc., Col. Eugene S. WitherspoonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Bofman v. Material Service Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Boone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.