Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gold Kist, Inc. v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 4, 1996No. A95A2795Published

1ConcurrenceBeasley, Chief Judge

I concur in the judgment that the case must be remanded for findings of fact and conclusions of law to be made by the trial judge. This is so because the law requires the court to do so “upon request of any party made prior to such ruling.” OCGA § 9-11-52 (a). The statute uses the word “shall.” The statutory requirement is an instance of procedural due process, designed not only to assure that the court as the sole factfinder and law applicator had an evidentiary basis for its understanding of the facts but also to allow appellate review of its legal conclusions applied to those facts. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spivey v. MaysonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. Burks v. FIRST UNION MORTGAGE CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Cage v. CHASE HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Carole Lyden Smith Enterprises, Inc. v. MathewCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API