Rosenbluth International, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Dissent
TURNER, P. J., Dissenting.
I would deny the mandate petition. The respondent court correctly decided that there is a triable issue as to whether *1080plaintiff, Jose Serrano, has standing to pursue the Unfair Practices Act claim against defendant, Rosenbluth International, Inc. Further, the trial court could conclude that defendant’s unreasonable refusal to respond to interrogatories, production demands, and admissions requests warranted denial of the summary judgment motion.
First, in terms of the merits, my views in this regard are premised on the express language of the Unfair Practices Act.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Stop Youth Addiction, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.