Legal Opinion
People v. Coleman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 18, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the People failed to disprove his albi defense beyond a reasonable doubt is not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, the defendant’s contention is without merit. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. UdzinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. VasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. RuizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. MarinusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Coleman v. New York City Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.