Legal Opinion
People v. Augusto
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 21, 1961No. Crim. 1568PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.
This is an appeal by the People from an order granting a motion by defendants under Penal Code, section 995, to set aside an information charging defendants with conspiracy to violate Business and Professions Code, section 2141.
Facts
The facts as shown by the record before us are substantially as follows: Defendant Lockwood held a license to practice chiropractic, under section 7 of the Chiropractic Act (codified in West’s Anno. Cal. Code as Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 1000-1007). Defendant Augusto held no license of any kind under either the Chiropractic Act or the State Medical Practice Act (Bus.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lorenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Cooper v. State Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Curtis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- People v. PlattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crees v. California State Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. DolbeerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. MarroneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Tain v. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.