Legal Opinion
Martin v. Swift & Company
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 28, 1964No. 39163PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
In these workmen’s compensation proceedings relator* Harold Martin, seeks review of an order of the Industrial Commission affirming a referee’s decision'that relator is not entitled to benefits for permanent total disability nor for temporary total disability beyond a 50-week healing period. While employed by respondent Swift & Company, relator was injured'on August 29, 1950, when a 200-pound side of beef fell 12 or 15 feet from the ceiling striking him on the head. He was hospitalized for 3 or 4 days following the accident and returned to work September 12, 1950, remaining…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Berg v. SadlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reese v. Preston Marketing AssociationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Mechling v. Jasper Stone CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Reierson v. Land O' Lakes Creameries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970