Legal Opinion
Dunham v. Astrue
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 24, 2009No. Civil Action 07-1106 (RWR)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Phillip Dunham appeals the decision the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”), finding Dunham ineligible for Social Security disability insurance (“SSDI”) benefits. Dun-ham claims that the administrative law judge (“ALJ”), whose decision became the Commissioner’s, erred by deciding that Dunham was not disabled within the regulations. The Commissioner opposes and moves for affirmance of his final decision. Because the ALJ did not consider or explain evidence contradicting his conclusion about Dunham’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Darius Scott v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Butler, Joan S. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Rose E. Brown v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Linda Godbey v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nicholson v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Broyles v. BarnhartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Colon v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2020
- Harvey v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Jackson v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.