Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2006No. 05-29PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[T1] Mr. Harris was charged under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-8-102 (LexisNexis 2005) which prohibits a person previously convicted of a violent felony from possessing a firearm. He entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving his right to appeal the district court's ruling on two pretrial motions. Mr. Harris contends the district court should have granted his motion to dismiss because he was charged under an unconstitutionally vague statute. He also claims the court erred by granting the State's motion in limine precluding him from presenting evidence that he did not knowingly violate…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grabill v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Griego v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Keser v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Carfield v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Geiger v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Teniente v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Crain v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Schaeffer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Hopkins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Pohlabel v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API