Legal Opinion

Runyan v. Mullins

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 7, 1993No. 2-92-200-CVPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEAVER, Justice.

This summary judgment appeal involves the issue of whether a survivor’s trust instrument was effectively amended by the surviving grantor. The more specific question is whether a letter signed by the surviving grantor, taken together with other related correspondence and documents, which were not signed by the grantor, was sufficient to amend the trust.

Appellants argued that the proposed trust amendment was not effective and their motion seeking summary judgment to that effect was denied. At the same time, appellees sought and obtained a summary judgment holding that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Lear Siegler, Inc. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Jones v. StraussTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Fambrough v. WagleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. O'NEIL v. MacK Trucks, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. CU Lloyd's of Texas v. FeldmanTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Starcrest Trust v. Berry, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  3. Montgomery v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  4. Double Diamond, Inc. v. Hilco Electric Cooperative, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2003
  5. American Housing Foundation v. Brazos County Appraisal District, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API