Legal Opinion
Cox v. City of Charleston
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 26, 2005No. 03-1782, 03-1880PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINS wrote the opinion, in which Judge TRAXLER and Judge KING joined.
OPINION
WILKINS, Chief Circuit Judge.
The City of Travelers Rest, South Carolina (the City), has a significant interest in ensuring that its streets and sidewalks remain safe, orderly, and accessible. See Madsen v. Women’s Health Ctr., Inc., 512 U.S. 753, 768, 114 S.Ct. 2516, 129 L.Ed.2d 593 (1994). This case concerns whether a local parade ordinance, enacted by the City to effectuate that significant interest, is consistent with the First Amendment. The City appeals a decision of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Walter Gordon v. William D. Leeke, Commissioner Joe Martin, Warden, Wayne Stephen Young v. George H. Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- New York Times Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Berger v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Aaron Ross v. Wayne EarlyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Green v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Michael Marcavage v. City of ChicagCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Clayton Hulbert v. Brian PopeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.