Legal Opinion
Bell & Murphy & Associates, Inc. v. Interfirst Bank Gateway, N.A.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 21, 1990No. 89-1719PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Bell & Murphy and Associates, Inc., and four of its employees (collectively, “Bell & Murphy”) filed suit in Texas state court against First RepublicBank Dallas, N.A. (“Republic”), and Republic officer Charles E. Jobe, seeking monetary damages for alleged fraudulent misrepresentations by the bank. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) intervened as receiver for the insolvent Republic, removed the case to federal district court, and then successfully moved to dismiss Bell & Murphy’s claims as barred by the doctrine of D’Oench, Duhme & Co. v. FDIC, 315…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Harold v. Beighley v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Henry E. McClanahanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Federal Savings And Loan Insurance Corporation v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- National Enterprises, Inc. v. Paul SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Texas Refrigeration Supply, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- American Federation of State Employees v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Bell & Murphy And Associates, Inc. v. Interfirst Bank Gateway, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Cardente v. Fleet Bank of Maine, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.