Legal Opinion

Moore & McFerrin v. McGuire

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas

Decided January 10, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. The complainants seek by this bill to quiet their title to a tract of land constituting an island in the Mississippi river, now known as “Island No. 76.” The material allegations in the original bill and amendment thereto are that the complainants, citizens of the state of Illinois, are the owners and in pop-session of the lands in controversy, which are situated in the county of Desha and state of Arkansas.

Read the full summary

In Equity. The complainants seek by this bill to quiet their title to a tract of land constituting an island in the Mississippi river, now known as “Island No. 76.” The material allegations in the original bill and amendment thereto are that the complainants, citizens of the state of Illinois, are the owners and in pop-session of the lands in controversy, which are situated in the county of Desha and state of Arkansas. They derain their title to all of the lands except 51 acres as follows: Certificates of purchase and patents from the United States government, issued in July, 1847, and at…

1Opinion of the CourtTrieber, District Judge

(after stating the facts). 1. Where is the western boundary line of the state of Mississippi, under the act of Congress admitting the state into the Union?

The language of the act of Congress admitting that state into the Union, approved March 1, 1817, describes the western boundary of the state as follows:

“Beginning on the river Mississippi at the point where the southern boundary line of the state of Tennessee strikes the same; thence east; * * * thence south; * * * thence west along the said degree of latitude to the Mississippi river; thence up the same to the beginning.” 3 Stat. 348, c.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Virginia v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. St. Louis v. RutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Cummings v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySupreme Court of the United States · 1820

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re HawksDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API