Legal Opinion
Weadock v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided May 7, 1930No. 12952Published
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
In his motion for rehearing the appellant, through his counsel, stresses his contention that the affidavit upon which the conviction is based is not in compliance with the statute, either in’ form or in substance. The statute, article 3415, R. S., 1925, reads thus:
“No executor or administrator shall allow claim for money against his testator or intestate, nor shall the county judge approve the same, unless such claim is accompanied by an affidavit that the claim is just and that all legal offsets, payments and credits known to affiant have been…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cannon v. McDanielTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Atwood v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
- State v. MadiganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Manning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Maynard v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.