Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 22, 1933No. 15388PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is an attempt to pass a forged instrument; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years, as defined in article 996, P. C., 1925.

The appellant presented to Harry Johnson, a salesman in *537the store of Katz & Sullivan, in payment of some merchandise, a check for $72.40, purporting to have been drawn upon the United Gas Public Service Company, signed by R. R. Lott, District Cashier, and payable to W. E. Davis. While preparing the goods selected by the appellant, Johnson gave the check to Katz, to whom the appellant represented that his name…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hepworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. West v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API