Spradley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was indicted and convicted for possession of marijuana. Sentence was two years' imprisonment.
I
The defendant argues that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction because the State failed to prove that the substance found in his possession was marijuana.
The alleged defect in the sufficiency of the State's evidence was supplied by a stipulation. Immediately before the State rested on its case in chief, the following occurred.
"THE COURT: Now, that was the understanding I had, but let's get the record straight. Is it stipulated or not that this Exhibit that was just…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Nettles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Worthy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- Hickman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.