Legal Opinion

OCILLA TRUCK & IMPLEMENT COMPANY v. Nolan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 9, 1971No. 46240PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff in a suit on open account seeking to recover $1,678 appeals from the judgment based on a verdict for $500.

The difference in amount approximately represents the only controversial item in the account, a machine called a peanut shaker. The defendant pleaded and introduced testimony on total failure of consideration and breach of implied warranty, i.e., the machine was totally worthless for the intended purpose of shaking peanut plants since it jammed up constantly and also stripped many plants.

1. The court did not err in allowing defendant and his son to testify…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Black v. AultmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. John Deere Co. v. Lindsey Land Clearing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Colson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Horton v. AmmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. North Peachtree I-285 Properties, Ltd. v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Wiggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API