United States v. Lawrence Lynde
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
Section 2G2.2 of the Sentencing Guidelines increases the recommended sentence in child-pornography cases if the offense involves a minor under the age of 12, the use of a computer, or other aggravating factors. This Guideline has repeatedly been subject to the criticism that its enhancements apply in most child-pornography cases and generate unduly harsh sentences. Our court has just as repeatedly rebuffed claims that courts must decline to follow § 2G2.2 because it arose from too much democratic tinkering by Congress and not enough empirical research by the Sentencing…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Zachariah Jay HistedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. Clarence GoodwinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Nashaun DrakeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
- United States v. Jon AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Robert HaggertyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.