Legal Opinion · Dissent

Heffernan v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 7, 1983No. CR81-82Published

1DissentJohn I. Purtle, Justice

I do not understand the reasoning behind the majority opinion any more than I understand the refusal of the trial court to allow individual sequestered questioning of proposed jurors. I recognize it takes time and expense to try a criminal case but it just so happens that both the Arkansas and Federal Constitutions provide for just that. In most cases the accused is a resident and citizen of the nation and many times of the state in which he is brought to trial. Therefore, such a person, being one of the people with whom the reserved power to change our laws lies, is entitled to due process…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Williamson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Figeroa v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. Thrasher v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API