Sayers v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Although we find no merit in the appellant’s attacks upon his convictions, we do agree that the trial court erred in failing to renew the offer of assistance of counsel at the sentencing hearing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.111(d)(5); Carter v. State, 408 So.2d 766 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Baranko v. State, 406 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Billions v. State, 399 So.2d 1086 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); see generally Machwart v. State, 222 So.2d 38 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969).
*986Accordingly, the judgments of conviction are affirmed, the sentences imposed are vacated, and the cause remanded to the trial court for resentencing,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- MacHwart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Billions v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Baranko v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Symonette v. StateCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1987