State ex rel. Batten v. Reece
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
“Procedendo is a high prerogative writ of an extraordinary nature. It is an order from a court of superior jurisdiction to proceed to judgment * * *. Procedendo does not lie where * * * there is no clear legal right to such relief.” State, ex rel. Ratliff, v. Marshall (1972), 30 Ohio St. 2d 101, 102; State, ex rel. St. Sava, v. Riley (1973), 36 Ohio St. 2d 171, 174.
Appellee’s order of January 21, 1981, constitutes a final order or judgment within the meaning of R. C. 2505.02.*
*248Appellant argues, however, that appellee should be ordered to proceed to a determination of his motion for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pitts v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- L.A. & D., Inc. v. Board of Lake County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. St. Sava Serbian Orthodox Church v. RileyOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- State ex rel. Ratliff v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gallick v. Franklin Cnty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. WilmingtonOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Fougere v. Estate of FougereOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. BarnettOhio Court of Appeals · 2016